ZMedia Purwodadi

Aprilia RS 457 vs Yamaha R3: Italy's Fireworks Display vs Japan's Batarang — India's Most Intense Sportbike Duel Under ₹5 Lakh

Table of Contents

 

image credits: autocarindia


Picture this. You bought your first proper sportbike a couple of years ago — an R15, an RC 200, maybe a Gixxer 250. You've ridden it everywhere. You know its limits. You're ready to go further. You want to cross that 300cc mark. You want 40 PS. You want two cylinders. And for exactly that, two motorcycles exist in India under ₹5 lakh that offer twin-cylinder engines and genuine supersport character: the Aprilia RS 457 and the Yamaha YZF-R3.

Both are fully faired twin-cylinder sportbikes. Both will push you to the edges of your intermediate riding skill. Both are, in their own ways, revelations.

But they are — as Motoring World's extended comparison put it so precisely — a fireworks display versus a batarang. One is spectacular, explosive, and designed to announce itself. The other is precise, honed, and designed to fly perfectly every single time. Understanding which description applies to which motorcycle is the entire story of this comparison.

The current pricing as of February 2026 makes the setup even more interesting: the RS 457 starts at ₹4.22 lakh ex-showroom (post-IBW 2025 price revision), while the Yamaha R3 — imported as a CBU from Indonesia — is priced at ₹4.80 lakh. The RS 457 is ₹58,000 cheaper, locally manufactured, and by almost every objective specification measure, the more comprehensively equipped motorcycle.

And yet the Yamaha R3 has a legitimate, specific, and compelling case. Here is the full story.


Design & Road Presence: The Biggest Bike Feels

The RS 457 looks smashing, not just from a distance, but also when you sit on it. This really feels like a scaled-down big bike rather than a grown-up small bike. You'll feel that in the sheer size of the fuel tank (although it holds just 13 litres) as well as the wide handlebar placement. Drawing design inspiration from the larger RS 660 — Aprilia's mid-capacity supersport — the RS 457 carries the triple-cluster headlamp, dual winglets, aerodynamic side fairing vents, underbelly exhaust, and the visual mass of a 600cc motorcycle. From five metres away, it passes for a big-bore Aprilia. This is not accidental — it is the most important design achievement on the RS 457.

The Yamaha R3, by comparison, looks like exactly what it is: a handsome, well-proportioned, thoroughly familiar Japanese sportbike with a face update. The updated R3 has that typical sharp Japanese sportbike look with a handsome face and a sharp tail section. It's an attractive thing. But it appears a bit small compared to the RS 457 — and at a price of ₹4.80 lakh for a CBU import, the visual presence gap is a legitimate buying-decision factor. BikeDekho's reviewer specifically noted that the combination of smaller physical size and somewhat ordinary plastic quality makes it easy to mistake the R3 for a Yamaha R15 V4 from a distance — which at ₹4.80 lakh is not a comparison Yamaha India will appreciate.

The RS 457's panels flow with Italian cohesion, finish levels are top-notch, and there is not one spot or angle of the Aprilia that looks ungainly. The R3's non-adjustable brake and clutch levers, the wiring visible around the console, and the overall somewhat plasticky switchgear quality tell the story of a motorcycle whose underlying design is a decade old despite the face refresh.

Riding position: This also extends to the riding position where the wider Aprilia feels like a size up compared to the slim R3 with its narrow clip-on handlebars. The RS 457 is the more committed riding position — a slightly more forward lean, wider bars, a physical sense of a motorcycle that wants to be ridden with purpose. The R3 is narrower, lighter-feeling, and more accommodating. Riders who spend significant time in city traffic will feel the R3's narrower proportions as a daily-use benefit.

Design verdict: RS 457 — comprehensively. The big-bike presence, Italian finish quality, and design coherence make it the more desirable motorcycle at first sight and sustained acquaintance.


image credits: autocarindia


Specifications: The Displacement Advantage Explained

SpecificationAprilia RS 457Yamaha YZF-R3
Engine457cc LC parallel-twin, 270° crank321cc LC parallel-twin, 180° crank
Power47.58 PS @ 9,400 rpm41.4 PS @ 12,000 rpm
Torque43.5 Nm @ 6,700 rpm29.5 Nm @ 10,000 rpm
Gearbox6-speed + slipper clutch (standard)6-speed + slipper clutch (standard)
QuickshifterOptional accessory❌ Not available
Front Suspension41mm USD, preload adjustable41mm USD, non-adjustable
Rear SuspensionMonoshock, preload adjustableMonoshock, preload adjustable
Front Brake320mm floating disc, ByBre 4-piston radial298mm disc
Rear Brake220mm disc, ByBre single-piston220mm disc
Traction Control✅ Yes (3 levels, switchable off)❌ No
Riding Modes✅ 3 modes (Sport, Road, Rain)❌ No
Instrument Cluster5-inch TFT with BluetoothLCD (no Bluetooth, no TFT)
ABSDual-channelDual-channel
Ride-by-Wire✅ Yes❌ No
Seat Height820 mm780 mm
Fuel Tank13 litres14 litres
Kerb Weight~175 kg~169 kg
Top Speed193 kph (Aprilia US claimed)~178 kph
Price (ex-showroom)₹4.22 lakh₹4.80 lakh
ManufactureLocal (India)CBU (Indonesia)

The specification table tells a remarkably clear story. The RS 457 leads in: displacement advantage (457cc vs 321cc), torque advantage (43.5 Nm vs 29.5 Nm — delivered 3,300 rpm earlier), bigger brakes (320mm vs 298mm with superior ByBre radial caliper), traction control (RS 457 standard, R3 absent), riding modes (3 vs none), TFT display with Bluetooth (vs LCD without), ride-by-wire throttle, adjustable front suspension (vs non-adjustable on R3), optional quickshifter (no equivalent on R3), and lower price (₹4.22L vs ₹4.80L).

The R3 leads in: slightly lighter weight (169 vs 175 kg), lower seat height (780 vs 820 mm, a meaningful accessibility difference for shorter riders), and 1 extra litre of fuel capacity (14 vs 13 litres).

BikeDekho's displacement metaphor captures the power difference memorably: imagine the same amount of work being done by 457 people versus 321 people. The outcome is not in doubt. It's not just the power figures — it's the stress on the engine. The RS 457 produces 47.58 PS from 457cc; the R3 produces 41.4 PS from 321cc. The R3's engine is working considerably harder to get close to the RS 457's output. You can hear it.


The Engine Contrast: Two Very Different Musical Instruments

The most important thing to understand about these two engines is that their performance on paper tells only half the story. The other half is sound, feel, and character — and here the gap between Italian and Japanese engineering philosophy is as wide as the Adriatic.

The Aprilia RS 457: The Deep-Voiced Italian

The RS 457 belts out a note that no bike in this segment has before. That 270-degree firing order has given this engine a surprisingly deep sound with an intoxicating bark that sounds good at pretty much any rpm. Between the displacement and the 270-degree crank, the RS 457 felt more like a V-motor than a parallel-twin — the uneven firing interval mimics the cross-plane crankshaft character of larger V-twin engines, creating a pulse and a thump that is genuinely distinctive at any speed.

The 270-degree crank also defines the engine's character in motion. The RS 457 has a grunty feeling that dominates its riding experience — it responds well from right above 3,000 rpm, the mid-range is strong, and when you close in on the redline in fifth gear, there is still plenty of scope for velocity left. The RS 457 is the fastest locally manufactured motorcycle Autocar India has ever tested. And it's not just flat-out acceleration — the RS 457 is comprehensively quicker in both standing and rolling acceleration tests. While Autocar India's website content confirms a top speed claim of 193 kph from Aprilia's US website, the key point is the RS 457's effortlessness at 160 kph and beyond — a speed that requires obvious effort from the R3.

The Yamaha R3: The High-Revving Japanese Screamer

The R3 makes a familiar sound — a conventional 180-degree parallel-twin note that is pretty unconventional at low revs but sounds excitingly good when you rev it out. At max revs, it may even be louder than the RS 457. The R3 demands revs for progress — at low and mid-range speeds, it lacks the grunt to match the RS 457's effortless pull, requiring more frequent gearshifts and more throttle input to maintain equivalent pace. But once you commit to revving the R3 toward its 12,000 rpm power peak, it delivers a screaming, sharp, high-energy character that is the defining Japanese supersport experience.

The R3's engine also manages city heat better in one respect: both motorcycles manage engine heat well in stop-go traffic, but the R3's narrower, lighter proportions make it more comfortable to manoeuvre in tight spaces. Both engines are tractable at low revs — you can ride around in higher gears at low speeds without complaints on either motorcycle.

Engine verdict: RS 457 for real-world performance, character, mid-range grunt, and the acoustic identity of that 270-degree crank. R3 for the high-revving Japanese scream that rewards commitment and is the more mechanically stress-free engine at its power output.


image credits: autocarindia


Chassis, Suspension & Handling

This section contains the comparison's most technically significant finding — and the one that defines the riding experience most clearly on a track or fast road.

The RS 457 is sharper and more engaging with excellent feel and feedback. Its aluminium chassis feels more taut and the same goes for the suspension, which gives the bike a more controlled feel at high lean angles. The Aprilia's TVS Eurogrip tyres also feel much more grippy and trustworthy than the R3's Dunlop rubber. The RS 457's aluminium perimeter frame is technically a more sophisticated architecture than the R3's steel diamond frame — lighter, stiffer, and more dimensionally stable under hard cornering loads.

The RS 457's four-piston ByBre radial front brake caliper — gripping a 320mm floating disc — delivers a feedback quality and stopping power that the R3's single-piston unit on a 298mm disc cannot match. The Aprilia's brakes are sharper, although the stock brake pads can overheat under repeated hard braking conditions — a note that track day riders should treat as a first-modification prompt.

The R3 is a very neutral and engaging handler in standard form. It sticks to its line well through long, fast corners. However, when you push it hard, the soggy rear shock and average Dunlop tyres let it down. With some modifications — better rear shock, upgraded rubber — it has the potential to be an excellent track motorcycle. Stock, the Aprilia is the better handler out of the box — no argument.

However, the R3 has one meaningful handling advantage: city manageability. The RS 457's steering feels lighter and you need to put less effort into turning the handlebar from side to side in traffic — but the R3's overall narrower proportions, lower seat height (780mm vs 820mm), and lighter weight make it the more comfortable daily-use machine at low speeds and in tight spaces.

The 820mm seat height on the RS 457 is a genuine accessibility limitation. Riders below 5'7" will find themselves on tip-toes at the RS 457's seat height — manageable, but worth testing in person before purchase. The R3's 780mm seat is the more accessible of the two.

Chassis verdict: RS 457 wins comprehensively on track and fast-road performance. R3 wins on city manageability and accessibility for shorter riders.


Features: A Decade of Technology Difference

This category has the widest performance gap in the entire comparison — and it is the most consistent finding across every review of both motorcycles.

The Aprilia feels ten years younger than the R3 — and that makes sense, because not a lot has changed on the Yamaha since it debuted in 2015. The latest R3 gets an upside-down fork and a new face along with a revised fairing, but the rest is largely the same. This means no traction control, no TFT display, and not even a standard slipper clutch on older variants (the 2025 R3 does include a slipper clutch — confirming this was addressed).

The RS 457's technology brief:

  • 5-inch colour TFT with Bluetooth (Yamaha My Ride app equivalent for RS 457's dedicated Aprilia app)
  • 3 riding modes (Sport, Road, Rain) with distinct throttle mapping
  • Traction control (3 levels, switchable off)
  • Ride-by-wire throttle
  • ByBre 4-piston radial front caliper
  • Optional bidirectional quickshifter
  • Backlit switchgear

The Yamaha R3's technology brief:

  • LCD instrument cluster (no Bluetooth, no colour display)
  • No traction control
  • No riding modes
  • No ride-by-wire
  • Standard single-piston front brake caliper on 298mm disc
  • No quickshifter (not available as accessory or option)
  • Standard switchgear

For a motorcycle positioned at ₹4.80 lakh — higher than the better-equipped RS 457 — the R3's feature set is genuinely difficult to defend on the specification sheet alone. Autocar India's advice column addressed this directly: Yamaha's pricing for the R3 is disappointing and it certainly makes the Aprilia RS 457 look more appealing.


The R3's Case: Why It Still Sells and Why Some Buyers Still Choose It

After reading the above, the R3 may appear to be the clear loser. It is not — and understanding why requires honest engagement with what the R3 actually is.

Reliability and the Japanese Engineering Promise. The R3 comes with a rock-solid reputation for reliability. The 321cc engine has been in production in various markets since 2015, accumulated millions of km of owner data across the world, and has an almost entirely clean record on powertrain longevity. Yamaha's global engineering standards and the benefit of a decade of production refinement mean every R3 is a mature, sorted machine. The RS 457's 270-degree crank and newer architecture are excellent — but they do not yet have the same accumulated global track record as the R3's unit.

The RS 457 vs Aprilia reliability debate is, however, evolving. Motoring World's tester noted — with some pointed amusement — that Aprilia's MotoGP bike keeps conking off far too often for its own good. Nothing on the RS 457 gave me the impression that things would fall apart anytime soon — but the RS 457 has not yet accumulated 10 years of global production data.

Indonesian-Made vs Indian-Made. Overall, Indonesian-made Japanese felt better designed and finished than the Indian-made Italian. This is a direct Motoring World assessment — and it means that the R3's everyday tactile quality, the feel of every lever and action, and the fit-and-finish details that are experienced in daily riding are superior to the RS 457's. The R3's levers have that refined Japanese feel even if they are non-adjustable. The RS 457's switchgear, while functional, lacks the same precision feel.

The Ownership Ecosystem. Yamaha India's service network is considerably larger and more uniformly trained for R3 service than Aprilia India's dealer network. For riders outside Tier 1 cities, or riders who travel extensively across India, the difference in service access is material.

The R3 Will Go Fast the Longest. Motoring World's final summary: the RS 457 will go fastest, the R3 will go fast the longest. This is the most elegant articulation of the fundamental character difference — and it matters for buyers planning multi-thousand-km annual ownership rather than purely track-focused use.


image credits: autocarindia


Price: The Most Decisive Specification

Post-GST 2.0 (September 2025) and the India Bike Week 2025 pricing revision:

MotorcyclePrice (ex-showroom)Origin
Aprilia RS 457₹4.22 lakhLocally manufactured, India
Yamaha YZF-R3₹4.80 lakhCBU import, Indonesia
Price Gap₹58,000 in RS 457's favour

The RS 457 is locally manufactured — a strategic decision by Aprilia India (through the Piaggio-India relationship) that keeps costs below what CBU import would demand. The R3 is imported as a CBU from Indonesia, incurring full import duties that explain — though do not justify to buyers — its higher sticker.

For ₹58,000 less, the RS 457 offers more power, more torque, better brakes, traction control, riding modes, TFT display, and a bigger-feeling motorcycle. This is an extraordinarily difficult value proposition for the R3 to overcome — and it is the reason Autocar India, Motoring World, BikeDekho, and AutoX all ultimately conclude in favour of the RS 457 as the stronger all-round purchase.

The ₹58,000 gap, however, is not permanent. Yamaha India's pricing for the R3 reflects CBU import costs that would change dramatically if Yamaha were to either localise manufacturing or import via a different duty structure. The R3's pricing in other markets where it is locally produced is significantly more competitive.


3 Real-World Case Studies

Case Study 1: The Commuter-to-Corner Rider — Arjun, Pune

Arjun chose the RS 457 after test-riding both motorcycles on the same day. His deciding factors: the 270-degree crank's acoustic character — which he describes as the most satisfying thing he has heard from a sub-500cc engine — and the traction control, which gave him confidence in monsoon commuting on Pune's often wet roads. After seven months, his consistent observation is that the RS 457 demands commitment to be fully appreciated — at low speeds in traffic, its 820mm seat height requires tip-toe management at his 5'8" frame. On weekend rides through the Sahyadri ghats, it is transformative. He specifically notes that the Dunlop-equipped R3 he test-rode felt less trustworthy in his wet-road test laps than the RS 457's TVS Eurogrip rubber.

Case Study 2: The Long-Distance Reliability Seeker — Meera, Bengaluru

Meera is an R15 V4 owner who shortlisted both motorcycles for an upgrade. She ultimately chose the Yamaha R3 — paying the ₹58,000 premium over the RS 457 — for three reasons: the R3's decade-long global reliability record, Yamaha India's service network density across her travel routes (she rides Bengaluru–Coorg–Ooty–Kodaikanal on a circuit twice yearly), and the 780mm seat height that allows her to flat-foot confidently at 5'4". After four months, she describes the R3 as "relentlessly dependable" — it does exactly what she asks, never surprises, and she has not experienced the brake overheating concern that RS 457 track users note. Her standing concession: every time an RS 457 passes her in traffic, she acknowledges privately that it sounds better.

Case Study 3: The Track Day Convert — Vikram, Mumbai

Vikram tracks his motorcycle at Kari Motor Speedway four times per year. He bought the RS 457 specifically after reading Autocar India's track test — the fastest locally manufactured motorcycle Autocar India had ever tested at the time. After his first track session on the RS 457: the ByBre radial brakes are exceptional, the traction control's off-switch is his first action in each session, and the 270-degree bark reverberating off the pit lane walls is, in his words, "genuinely embarrassing for every other motorcycle on the same grid." His modification list after six months: better brake pads (the RS 457's stock pads overheat under repeated hard braking, as reported consistently in track reviews), a Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV rear tyre, and the optional bidirectional quickshifter. He has test-ridden the R3 at the same circuit. His verdict: the R3 is better than its specification suggests — but the RS 457 is in a different performance category.


Head-to-Head Verdict Table

CategoryWinnerReason
Design & Road PresenceAprilia RS 457 ✅Big-bike presence, Italian finish quality, RS 660-inspired fairing
Engine PerformanceAprilia RS 457 ✅47.58 PS vs 41.4 PS; 43.5 Nm vs 29.5 Nm; fastest locally manufactured motorcycle tested by Autocar India
Engine CharacterAprilia RS 457 ✅270-degree crank delivers V-twin-like bark; intoxicating at any rpm
Engine Refinement (daily)Yamaha R3 ✅R3's high-revving Japanese character is smoother at sustained moderate speeds
Gearbox FeelYamaha R3 ✅Japanese precision in every lever and action; RS 457 functional but less refined tactilely
Front BrakesAprilia RS 457 ✅ByBre 4-piston radial on 320mm floating disc — decisively better feel and power
Traction ControlAprilia RS 457 ✅3 levels, switchable off; R3 has none
Riding ModesAprilia RS 457 ✅Sport/Road/Rain; R3 has none
Instrument ClusterAprilia RS 457 ✅5-inch TFT with Bluetooth; R3 has non-Bluetooth LCD
Chassis DynamicsAprilia RS 457 ✅Aluminium perimeter frame; more taut, more feedback, better at high lean angles
Tyre Grip (stock)Aprilia RS 457 ✅TVS Eurogrip more trustworthy than R3's Dunlop rubber per tester consensus
Seat Height AccessibilityYamaha R3 ✅780mm vs 820mm — meaningful for riders below 5'7"
City ManageabilityYamaha R3 ✅Narrower, lighter, lower — more comfortable in traffic
Long-term ReliabilityYamaha R3 ✅Decade of global production data; Yamaha's engineering maturity
Service NetworkYamaha R3 ✅Yamaha India significantly denser than Aprilia India
Value for MoneyAprilia RS 457 ✅More features, more performance, at ₹58,000 less
Top SpeedAprilia RS 457 ✅193 kph claimed vs ~178 kph R3

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Aprilia RS 457 (₹4.22 lakh) if:

  • Performance is your primary criterion — the RS 457 is comprehensively faster in every real-world scenario
  • The 270-degree crank's V-twin acoustic character is worth more to you than any specification
  • Track days are part of your riding life — the ByBre brakes, aluminium frame, traction control, and riding modes are the right tools
  • The big-bike presence and Italian design identity match your ownership aspiration
  • You are above 5'7" or have tested the 820mm seat height and are comfortable with it
  • The RS 457's ₹58,000 price advantage over the R3 is a meaningful budget factor

Buy the Yamaha R3 (₹4.80 lakh) if:

  • Long-term reliability over 3–5 years of ownership is your primary concern — the R3's decade of global production data is irreplaceable reassurance
  • You ride extensively across India outside Tier 1 cities and need Yamaha's denser service network
  • The 780mm seat height is essential for your build — the RS 457's 820mm is a daily-use limitation that cannot be ignored
  • The refined Japanese tactile quality of every lever, every action, and every gearshift matters to your ownership experience
  • You are planning a bike specifically for long-distance touring where the RS 457's track-focused character is a daily compromise

Final Scorecard

CategoryAprilia RS 457Yamaha YZF-R3
Engine Performance⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Engine Character & Sound⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Chassis & Handling⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Features & Technology⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Design & Presence⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Brakes⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Seat Accessibility⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
City Usability⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Long-term Reliability⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Service Network⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Value for Money⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Overall4.4 / 53.8 / 5

The RS 457 wins this comparison convincingly on the objective scorecard — more performance, more features, more character, and a lower price. The Aprilia is effectively the most capable sportbike available under ₹5 lakh in India. On that brief, there is no ambiguity.

The R3's 3.8/5 in this framework is not a verdict that the R3 is a mediocre motorcycle. It is a verdict that the R3's genuine qualities — Japanese reliability, build feel, service accessibility — carry a ₹58,000 premium that the specification sheet does not justify. For the specific buyer whose primary concern is 5-year ownership reliability and who rides extensively outside Yamaha-dealership-dense cities: the R3 remains the defensible choice. For everyone else: the RS 457 is the answer.

The fireworks display wins. But the batarang never misses.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which is faster — Aprilia RS 457 or Yamaha R3? The RS 457 is comprehensively faster. In Autocar India's instrumented testing, it is the fastest locally manufactured motorcycle they have tested, outperforming the R3 in both standing and rolling acceleration. The 270-degree firing order engine produces 47.58 PS and 43.5 Nm versus the R3's 41.4 PS and 29.5 Nm — a combination that results in effortless 160+ kph performance where the R3 requires obvious effort. Aprilia's US website claims a top speed of 193 kph.

Q: Why is the Yamaha R3 more expensive than the RS 457 in India? The Yamaha R3 is imported as a fully built unit (CBU) from Indonesia, incurring full import duties. The RS 457 is locally manufactured in India by Aprilia India (through the Piaggio partnership), avoiding import duties and resulting in a ₹58,000 lower price despite offering more features and performance. In markets where Yamaha locally manufactures the R3, it is priced more competitively.

Q: Does the Yamaha R3 have traction control? No. The 2025 Yamaha R3 has dual-channel ABS as its only electronic rider aid. There is no traction control, no riding modes, and no ride-by-wire system. The Aprilia RS 457 offers three-level traction control (switchable off), three riding modes (Sport, Road, Rain), and full ride-by-wire throttle — all standard.

Q: Which is better for a first twin-cylinder upgrade from an R15? For performance-first R15 V4 owners: the RS 457. The 270-degree crank character is a direct continuation of the engagement the R15's CP2 engine provides, elevated dramatically. For reliability-first R15 owners or those below 5'7": the R3's Yamaha reliability, 780mm seat height, and familiar brand ecosystem make it the safer first twin-cylinder choice — at a ₹58,000 premium.

Q: Is the Aprilia RS 457 reliable enough for daily riding in India? Yes — with the caveat that the RS 457 has not accumulated the same global production history as the R3. Owner community reports (Team-BHP, BikeDekho user reviews) are broadly positive on reliability for normal street use. The brake overheating concern is specific to track and repeated hard-braking use — a brake pad upgrade addresses it completely. For city commuting and regular road riding, no systematic reliability issues have been reported.


💬 RS 457 or R3 — Which Twin Are You Riding?

The Aprilia RS 457 vs Yamaha R3 debate is one of the most active in India's performance motorcycle community — a battle of Italian ambition versus Japanese dependability that has been argued in every forum, every riding group, and every showroom visit since both motorcycles arrived.

Have you ridden both? Do you own one — and has it met or exceeded your expectations after six months? Has the R3's ₹58,000 premium been worth it for you, or did the RS 457's specification sheet make the decision obvious?

Drop your riding story, your mileage figures, your honest verdict, and your comparison take in the comments below. We read and respond to every one.

Post a Comment